<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Ppa on Benoit Petit&#39;s website</title>
    <link>https://bpetit.nce.re/tags/ppa/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Ppa on Benoit Petit&#39;s website</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 16:59:24 +0200</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://bpetit.nce.re/tags/ppa/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Why the &#39;100% electricity coming from renewables&#39; claims from Cloud, AI and Datacenters providers are not okay, and what could be done instead</title>
      <link>https://bpetit.nce.re/2026/08/why-the-100-electricity-coming-from-renewables-claims-from-cloud-ai-and-datacenters-providers-are-not-okay-and-what-could-be-done-instead/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 16:59:24 +0200</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://bpetit.nce.re/2026/08/why-the-100-electricity-coming-from-renewables-claims-from-cloud-ai-and-datacenters-providers-are-not-okay-and-what-could-be-done-instead/</guid>
      
        <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Image: solar panels reflecting the sun, from &lt;a href=&#34;https://www.flickr.com/photos/40888529@N00/3546825820&#34;&gt;Alex Lang&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We get transparency only as good as regulation makes it. Even knowing that, I&amp;rsquo;m still puzzled every time I see a &amp;ldquo;100% renewable energy&amp;rdquo; label regarding the electricity consumption of any service provider.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It&amp;rsquo;s not just in the Datacenter industry. Every single provider of service, including the ones that otherwise really tries to be a bit more sustainable than the average, intentionally (how handy) or unintentionally fall into this trap (sometimes using the claims of their own providers).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>